Christenson v. Donnelson

District Court, S.D. New York

Christenson v. Donnelson

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK C. CHRISTENSON, Plaintiff, 19-CV-11553 (CM) “against: ORDER OF DISMISSAL JULIE DONNELSON, UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1651

Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On June 20, 2018, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Christenson v. Roe, No. 18-CV- 3319 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2018). Plaintiff files this new pro se case without prepayment of the filing fee. Because Plaintiff cannot proceed IFP without leave of the Court to file, this action is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the June 20, 2018 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2019 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown