Starkes v. Annucci

[uspcspyy ee | | OCUMENT MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT | ELECTRONICALLY bila PpOC#e ot Starkes v, Byrd etal, etm 9126 |) 4 CV 7270 (VB) In the attached undated submissions, plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, requests the Court appoint him pro bono counsel (Doc. #13) and extend his time to comply with the Court’s November 13, 2019, Order to amend his complaint (Doc. #14). In his request for counsel, plaintiff states he “does not possess the skills to read or write” or “comprehend the full scope of his rights.” (Doc. #13).

Plaintiff's request for appointment of pro bono counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiff's claims, and plaintiff's ability to present the case. Plaintiffs assertions that he cannot comprehend the scope of his rights, and is unable to read or write to prosecute this action, are belied by his activity and filings in this case and others. See, e.g., Starkes v. Rikers Island Corr.

Facility, 19CV4017 (CM). At this time, the Court does not find any exceptional circumstances in plaintiff's case that would warrant the appointment of counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to submit his amended complaint is DENIED.

Plaintiff already filed an amended complaint, dated November 26, 2019. (Doc. #9).

Accordingly, plaintiff does not require an extension of time to comply with the November 13 Order to amend.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions. (Docs. ##13, 14).

The Clerk is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.

Dated: December 20, 2019 White Plains, NY SO hut | C2 Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge UNITED Sunt Disraict Couer | of 7 For. THe or Soutien “Licreict OF Nélv YORK (Ny) Quentin Seirkes, | □ Plainttf pro Seg | [: fo-/O0 (CM -VS- ! anes Ayvthony J Annuces , Doc & Lervisory Re Y E Gulwom) By rat, Correctional Officer (*C.0,”) | pe. 1 7 209 | Wath Rie #1725 ( C02) | = (anteraa) Nt eas *17U2 (C0) et i, PRO SE OFFICE : ster dans.

DLAINTIERS MOTION COR APPOINTIMEN LO! ; OUNCE COMES. NOW, Quextin Gartes, Paint, pro se, ard petitions this HONORABLE COURT to GRANT! his ayes fo appoint him Counsel Such, Plaintiff aves the fo lowing fi) Paint iF is an inmate at (MDC Brooklyn GD atih: » Brooklyy NY 1232 / @ Plaintiff hes no resources) or allies te adbaeuetely □□□□□ this Coc iv AW) Mean matt WAL 5 especially when □□□□□□□□□□ directions inthe ORDER as Panel nor Trained in baad wing Or has amy experielice In law, : @) In fact this writer, Ke net Pouck.“Qb743-O1S is Nina Painti€€ a Courtesy but is expected 6 Pepact □□□ Bras At □□□ Morten and Cannel Committ. titue.

Submisoms Pe this live HE, AN of). 4) rr nbn LAN eee we He ealedin 2 iene ». □□□□ | Is dio 3 out of schasl ot ABU UNA ARE s a lati comprehend the bul sone i his Nain ce eaiv Viblated , in cluding hic factyal alleqet Ons beta heacal Plant itt terete has already (equested the Appointment al ylumsel and Nasists. A Will be ‘the only Way be Can property Shlant (Bsponse, let alone the Specitic divécte< Of ‘ayovatlon At his Keppsl canthisions from, Well pladed Tactvel ANGeTTONS Oi is asking, of this Horowlde Court there tore □□□□□□□ a attorven (Who Can repety CmVey the Messages ne @ facts which pile 2 bine Chain for relief .

This Motion showed NOT be. Considered fe be this □□□□□□□ A rence Complaint lA amy Maret ana. Sha not be tlk (W)dors watil thes Motion is addressee aval arenired by the Chur | JVHECEFORE ) Hamtift Quentin Clackes Nwinlble PRAKS this HONORABLE Couel GRANT his Pages br te Appointment of Counsel avot ts Hen begin Th (od) dy ceeding submit ts Amended Comp Malvit: He) doy of Pespectbally Stet Duauler 2019 Ne ge @ | vo AN SH OL her □□ □□ : : i : | Ltt i i oN a ! ey | fof. Bae |e: | Te epon ale 23 : iy ee ae ante es 4 « = i . Whee Que DED ig Js Q; 45 = : “gaat ata: = OR =z aa “ate SS : 8b Oe ay = fg “Tv we ‘| | 4 a SO I SE | Fe] EE EB 8 i om ops : S| E8yGS RF SS py Bf 7 TS SA 3 a TP C ~ SR ’ wy 2 SS. ¢& |: . = (A aS 1 rs . oe. | . SYS Ss SH SO SUIS S ge ~S ge | $s □□□ | AI 8 then © gf Fe.)

NAB VOU SS > ee ~~ fou H oeenoed) KEES SMS RN SEW oe othe TR AG yy : | S ¢) 2. af | om ee YE et | OR. “rl e oppor A □□ ae , f r . ee fh Be □ Southern District-bf Naw York Ch ye) ATE Go i Dae De oo oS a STARK Sen ay FEE We DOSNT OMe” eS ttf \\o Ech edija \ yh a a Ih 1 eM ay □ AS pO’ 5: Yee ICA fo.

WArthonn J. Annucei, imenie | EER Geneseo’ Prod , Cortona Other (006) | PUR =| | A ce Ud aA witional CH kerf *C.0 Biv #172500) | ——s|_—_—(UMAY s 220 | WNiguas *\748, (00), etal.) | _lppaiacac | Dende | | CL i BINA : | MomiON TO Bx8i0 Due DATE Of FUTURE. SAMMEND [COMPLAINT TO_Co@ESPOND WiTHATHE (oa)DAYS □□□ Ls See " i WHICH LEAVE WAS As ALPERDY_ GRANTED) Rom THe DATE Fabien ABLE Tole Ph ifks Méhov. to Figpo □□□ JMSe ound this Caucts vew ale ar (Ones Aa Ga Sti 2S ait: rt DMm-S2 Gna asks, this HONORABLE. Cox pT b GR NT his request to □□□□□ Waticalan extend 0 ae H+ ((00 Adis. rw tne □□□□□ Fe ( ri. ‘ eceved Notice Reve tie. Cant eacting its decision □□ cline —_Taepowt Cassel Brains bethat he will nel te empla. j + ‘alhause lawyer br as: Hate. Aflecthis Court has □□□□ □ [Be 0 M Oyu Vai te and Ado te □□□□ dak SCA LAM “The Skamnpod As _|ec eMEd Bind □□□□ TNE (MINOW Pecies faved! □ by che Piaiiift (Wien Wis □□□ Tes CMa, Wands lt) As Such, PHiVintit □□□ Hollowina tacts: | po is nat possessing CLI te rose oc wicite and _has the Nhaly Ae vache, enheth Houck * 07434015 onlay: . | Wo | : Feat gat aie. QNeo. h OWE Plaintit® dons mi posse the abilities te Compctherd th rights. being, Violated, includrag, his factual allegations Al tHe thereto VAS Ad (PAGE ie Wy Riivi □□ of andl GISTs TT" | | ne. Jia b Ae AA Pyro A Mo nase, □□□ alone He speciha direch\les Of Seperétioa of hig legal Cam Hla factual allegations Plaintiff is asking, 2 HE s-seb able. Comet to zie 4 □□□ LOWE TE iO ee [AE SSPE fate Ih Al Clair elieke attiecney) This Matin. shal MOT be Casitered th boemteaciin. □□□ th, Aliended Comphint on any Mann cand shall Wave ih back th a telahVely cuick “thev~ rouse based on the □□□□□ □□□□ ae | Woe K U WG ANS CAWO\s SIAIWMA ea adknd the deadlie Layard) digs aswell Gs hawe th Gousikeed and. Nauked , thee Lams of Importance th IO SPCLCH Asda Fe 6 Pe all we AS SIAC Ma) OF (lod) days be grauded to begin onthe □□□□ 5 Cant Alte copputats nea. Counsel r- Henies tthe Lacmask rand fone b Hirt. i+ himself, wlhicl he 4 novdt_ dem, Either Way, □□□□□□□□ fue date pued badeLextnded jd pecttudlle,. Gabmittted i) nee Ki 2_—— Ae O ua a ES Vall : PTZ SB fo vo Td i { = □□ ee PEM SL Ne A Kan Toes aN x N feet f > □□ 4 i i re Se, ~C > GN : i ! x ae Aw. : { hanee | eo ° : -kY. | a te A : □ i Moh □ = □ □ ~ 8 if | t 1 . ‘ □ He | sy PEC : nd a @ oS rv □ □ omme> ot. □ | ix CSMeVe Ih ase | eli xs 8 S| od Q. □ : Jo SEA" : 1S XSF OO Iz ay SAXSE [| : : ae j some! + : (£0 So tTak | □ ! Gf § of & v 3 □ +O HO Be ¥} a 8 : = □□□ □ me = ‘wag i =" | A 4 4 : Ey AU. wets 2 = CEE RE SW EY a A She6 ey edlroagiag FU ot □ tes | 8 | a Roe Ee | ay | | □ | | ape epee tn eran Attra a . yf i ! | ! | | : !