Manko v. United States Postal Service
Manko v. United States Postal Service
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x
GENTIAN MANKO,
Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 20-CV-0273 (EK)(LB) -against-
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendant.
------------------------------------x
ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: The Court has received Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom’s Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated September 15, 2020. ECF No. 7. Judge Bloom recommends that this case be dismissed for failure to timely serve the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. Neither party filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error on the face of the record. See, e.g., Colvin v. Berryhill,
734 F. App’x 756, 758 (2d Cir. 2018). Having reviewed the record, the Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case.
SO ORDERED.
_/s Eric Komitee_________________ ERIC KOMITEE United States District Judge
Dated: October 13, 2020 Brooklyn, New York
Reference
- Status
- Unknown