Bey v. Campanelli

District Court, E.D. New York

Bey v. Campanelli

Trial Court Opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X

DARNEL POWELL BEY,

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER - against - 19-CV-5304 (RPK) (PK)

ROBIN B. CAMPANELLI; ROBERT MCDONALD; LISA CORSO; MR. GALAN; MR. MCCULLER; MR. SANTIAGO; MR. TOMMY; MR. VETTER,

Defendants. X

RACHEL P. KOVNER, United States District Judge: On September 16, 2019, plaintiff Darnel Powell Bey filed this action against four police officers, an assistant district attorney, and several private parties. He alleges that local police arrested him and confiscated his car. Liberally read, the complaint alleges that the arrest and confiscation were improper because plaintiff has immunity as a “Moorish American National.” On August 3, 2020, I issued an order that dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and noted that the complaint could alternatively be dismissed because it was frivolous and failed to state a claim. Nevertheless, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint that set forth (i) a basis for this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction and (ii) factual and legal bases for his claims against each individual defendant. The order further stated that if plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within thirty days, judgment would be entered dismissing the case. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in 1 United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. /s/ Rachel Kovner Rachel P. Kovner United States District Judge

Dated: October 20, 2020 Brooklyn, New York

2

Reference

Status
Unknown