Wilder v. Albany County
Wilder v. Albany County
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________________________
JENNIFER WILDER
Plaintiff, v. 9:19-cv-0130 (BKS/ATB)
ALBANY COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants. ___________________________________________
Appearances:
For Plaintiff: Michael Diederich, Jr. 361 Route 210 Stony Point, New York 10980
For Defendants: Daniel C. Lynch Albany County Attorney Michael L. Goldstein, Of Counsel 112 State Street Albany, New York, 12207
Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge:
DECISION AND ORDER
On March 16, 2020, defendants filed a statement noting the death of Plaintiff Jennifer Wilder under Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stating that they were notified of plaintiff’s death on or about March 4, 2020, by counsel for plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 21). According to defendants’ letter, defendants served the statement of death on plaintiff’s attorney via ECF and regular mail on March 16, 2020. (Dkt. No. 21). Rule 25 states, in relevant part: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). As more than 90 days have passed since defendants’ filing of the suggestion of death and service of a copy on plaintiff's attorney and as no motion for substitution has been made, the complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. See Brown v. New York State Dep’t of Corr. Servs., No. 03-cv-175S,
2004 WL 2473311, at *1,
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32172, at *4 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2004) (finding dismissal appropriate where the “Defendants properly served the Suggestion of Death on Plaintiff at his last known address at the Orleans Correctional Facility ... more than ninety days ha[d] passed since such service” and no motion for substitution had been made). It is therefore ORDERED that in accordance with Rule 25(a)(1) the complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 23, 2020
Brenda K. Sannes U.S. District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown