Green v. Annucci
Green v. Annucci
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
HIKEEM GREEN,
Plaintiff, 9:18-cv-0703 (BKS/ATB)
v.
DAVID HAIMES,
Defendant.
Appearances: Plaintiff, pro se Hikeem Green Huntington Station, NY For Defendant: Letitia James Attorney General of the State of New York Nicholas L. Zapp Assistant Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Hikeem Green, a former New York State inmate, commenced this action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting claims arising out of his incarceration. (Dkt. No. 16). On June 11, 2020, Defendant David Haimes filed a motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 45). Plaintiff did not file a response even though his deadline to respond was sua sponte extended by the Court. (Dkt. No. 48). This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter who, on August 31, 2020, issued a Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed in its entirety. (Dkt. No. 49). Magistrate Judge Baxter advised the parties that under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the Report, and that the failure to object to the Report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. (Dkt. No. 49, at 12). No objections have been filed. As no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report- Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue,
2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 229(N.D.N.Y. 2012) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee Notes to 1983 amendment). Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts the Report- Recommendation in its entirety. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 49) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 45) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 16) is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 26, 2020 Syracuse, New York Aer of A kc nannies BrendaK.Sannes U.S. District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown