Witchko v. Schorsch
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Eg JOANNE WITCHKO, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AMERICAN REALTY : ORDER CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC., : : 15 Civ. 6043 (AKH) Plaintiff, : -against- : NICHOLAS S. SCHORSCH, et al., Defendants, USDC SDNY : DOCUMENT -and- : ELECTRONICALLY FILED |!
Aerie DOC #: AM CAN REALTY CAPITAL PROPERTIES, DATE FILED: (/ 3/ZO.
Nominal Defendant. : pone ence eee eee □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Unless Derivative Plaintiffs’ counsel provides contemporaneous and detailed billing records showing services they performed in each particular aspect of the case and showing disbursements, their claim for attorneys’ fees will not be recognized. See N.Y. State for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey, 711 F.2d 1136, 1147-48 (2d Cir. 1983) (“Hereafter, any attorney ... who applies for court-ordered compensation in this Circuit for work done after the date of this opinion must document the application with contemporaneous time records.
These records should specify, for each attorney, the date, the hours expended, and the nature of the work done.”); see also Scott v. City of New York, 626 F.3d 130, 132-34 (2d Cir. 2010).
This order requires such records as to each counsel seeking fee recovery. The records shall be filed, along with the materials referenced in my prior order dated January 3, 2020 (ECF No. 296) by January 10, 2020.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York January 3, 2020 ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.