Guglielmo v. Mjic Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Guglielmo v. Mjic Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED JOSEPH GUGLIELMO, on behalf of himself pote FILED: I/y/2e and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No, 19-CV-11074 (RA) v. ORDER MJIC INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice, but that the parties may □□ seek to restore the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. □ Dated: January 7, 2020 [ New York, New York RonnieAbrams s—tS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown