Davalloo v. Kaplan
Davalloo v. Kaplan
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR at SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Be | THLo eee nee nner ene nenn ee □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ pe ope CS SHEILA DAVALLOO, Petitioner, AMENDMENT TO y ’ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 18, 2019 SABINA KAPLAN, Superintendent, Bedford : Hills Correctional Facility, 16 CV 9342 (VB) Respondent. : ee en ee renee een eee ee The Court amends its October 18, 2019, Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. #37), as follows: As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray,
413 F.3d 192, 195(2d. Cir. 2005). In addition, the Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). The Clerk is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address on the docket. Dated: January 7, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: |
Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown