Davalloo v. Kaplan

District Court, S.D. New York

Davalloo v. Kaplan

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR at SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Be | THLo eee nee nner ene nenn ee □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ pe ope CS SHEILA DAVALLOO, Petitioner, AMENDMENT TO y ’ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 18, 2019 SABINA KAPLAN, Superintendent, Bedford : Hills Correctional Facility, 16 CV 9342 (VB) Respondent. : ee en ee renee een eee ee The Court amends its October 18, 2019, Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. #37), as follows: As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2); Love v. McCray,

413 F.3d 192, 195

(2d. Cir. 2005). In addition, the Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). The Clerk is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address on the docket. Dated: January 7, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: |

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown