Jules v. Chesner

Posh Pee Se PRe SONAL fy Pablo | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POC # SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ce eee pee het a ee eeneeeeeeeweneeX TAAPE PEP poe (| ¢|2020 □ EVITA JULES, Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC) -against- JUDGMENT COSMETIC AND RECONSTRUCTION DENTISTRY, DR. MICHAEL CHESNER D.D.S., AND DR. ROBERT B. VOGEL, D.D.S., PLLC, Defendants. penne eee ee □□□ eee ee eee een eee enenene XK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 7, 2020, the R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Because the R&R gave the parties adequate warning, see R&R, Dkt. 23 at 1112, Plaintiff's failure to file adequate and specific objections to the R&R precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Mario, 313 F.3d at 766; accordingly, the case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York January 8, 2020 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: WN ange > Deputy Cl