Williams v. New York
Williams v. New York
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CURTIS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 1:18-CV-8353 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NEW YORK, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 15, 2019, the Court reopened this action and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action as frivolous, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant that is immune from such relief. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action as frivolous, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant this is immune from such relief.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (41), (it). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2020 , New York, New York hie. ly Wk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown