Frost v. City of New York (HRA)
Frost v. City of New York (HRA)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 20-CV-0305 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CITY OF NEW YORK (HRA); N.Y.P.D.; UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651NYC MTA, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.! The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu Wyk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
' Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service. (ECF No. 3.)
Reference
- Status
- Unknown