Columbus v. Scott
Columbus v. Scott
Trial Court Opinion
DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: [/25 / Zz
JOSEPH COLUMBUS, Plaintiff, V. No. 19-CV-6722 (RA) CAROLYN DALEY SCOTT, HK RECOVERY GROUP, INC., PINPOINT ORDER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and RONALD HUGHES, Defendants.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 28, 2020 New York, New York Ronhie Abrams United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown