Frost v. World Trade Center

District Court, S.D. New York

Frost v. World Trade Center

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 20-CV-0641 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL WORLD TRADE CENTER; NYC MTA; CITY UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1651

OF NEW YORK (HRA); NYPD, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: In an order dated November 7, 2019, and entered the next day, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2020 New York, New York hie, l hk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown