UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 1:20-CV-1154 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL FRESH DIRECT, et al., UNDER

Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: In an order dated November 7, 2019, and entered the next day, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in this Court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019).1 On February 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed this new pro se civil action with a request to proceed IFP. Plaintiff has not sought leave from the Court to file this action. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order in Frost, ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to note service on the docket. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of Court documents. (ECF 3.)

1 In an order dated January 27, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause within 15 days why the Court should not impose additional filing restrictions on her. See Frost v. NYPD, ECF 1:20-CV-0417, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2020). The Court certifies, pursuant to

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2020 , New York, New York hie. I Wik Chief United States District Judge