Frost v. City of New York (HRA)
Frost v. City of New York (HRA)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 20-CV-0963 (CM) ~against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CITY OF NEW YORK (HRA), UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se case seeking to proceed IFP. Because Plaintiff has not sought leave from the Court to file this action, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order.! The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 13, 2020 , New York, New York hie. In Wyk Chief United States District Judge
' Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. (ECF No. 3.)
Reference
- Status
- Unknown