Frost v. NYPD
Frost v. NYPD
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, 20-CV-1310 (CM) ~against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NYPD, et al., UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On November 7, 2019, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in this Court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining leave to file. See Frost v. City of New York (HRA), ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff filed this new pro se civil action with a request to proceed IFP, and has not sought leave to file. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order in Frost, ECF 1:19-CV-8936, 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to note service on the docket. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of Court documents. (ECF 3.) The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2020 New York, New York hie. Ib Wick COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown