District Court, S.D. New York, 2020

Ramirez v. QFlorist Inc.

Ramirez v. QFlorist Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided March 4, 2020
Ramirez v. QFlorist Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PEDRO VIVAR RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, against CIVIL ACTION NO.: 19 Civ. 7318 (SLC) ORDER TO SUBMIT QFLORIST INC, et al, SETTLEMENT MATERIALS Defendants.

SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case contains one or more claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act. In light of the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), the parties must file a joint Letter-Motion that addresses whether the settlement is fair and reasonable.

The parties must file their Letter-Motion by March 18, 2020, and should address the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the bases for any such calculations, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defendants’ defenses, any other factors that justify the discrepancy between the potential value of plaintiff’s claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, as well as any other issues that might be pertinent to the question of whether the settlement is reasonable (for example, the collectability of any judgment if the case went to trial).

The joint Letter-Motion should also explain the attorney fee arrangement, attach a copy of the retainer agreement, and provide information as to actual attorney’s fees expended.

Finally, a copy of the settlement agreement itself must accompany the joint Letter-Motion.

Dated: New York, New York March 4, 2020 SO ORDERED (SARAH L. CAVE United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.