(RIO LIN | DOCUMENT || ELECTRONICALLY FILED | | DOC#: □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i! OO cnn gag fe ee |] SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE it ED, 44/030 | ween eee eee eee eee X aaa OE EVITA JULES, Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 5008 (VEC) -against- JUDGMENT COSMETIC AND RECONSTRUCTION DENTISTRY, DR. MICHAEL CHESNER D.D.S., AND DR. ROBERT B. VOGEL, D.D.S., PLLC, Defendants. ween nent nee nee eee nee eee nenee XK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 6, 2020, the R&R is ADOPTED in full. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Because the R&R gave the parties adequate warning, see R&R, Dkt. 23 at 1112, Plaintiff's failure to file adequate and specific objections to the R&R precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cty.,

(2d Cir. 2008); Mario, 313 F.3d at 766. Accordingly, the Court certifies pursuant to

(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, permission to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of appeal is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 9, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Clerk