Swartz v. Equinox Hudson Yards, Inc.
Swartz v. Equinox Hudson Yards, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UsSDC-SDINY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: A q Ce
HELEN SWARTZ, Plaintiff. 19-CV-11747 (RA) ORDER Vv. — EQUINOX HUDSON YARDS, INC., Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson y. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. j Dated: March 9, 2020 “ New York, New York A ee / □□□ ao cen gone see Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown