Aquino v. Joseph's Auto Center, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Aquino v. Joseph's Auto Center, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

[spc SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | a FILED EDDY AQUINO, DATE FILED) 4/10/2020 Plaintiff, 18-CV-2009 (BCM) -against- ORDER JOSEPH'S AUTO CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants.

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has received and reviewed the parties’ joint letter dated February 25, 2020 (Joint Ltr.) (Dkt. No. 53), seeking approval of their Settlement Agreement (Agreement) (Dkt. No. 53-1), pursuant to Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,

796 F.3d 199

(2d Cir. 2015). The Agreement requires defendants Joseph's Auto Center, Inc. and Carl Bucalo to pay $52,500 to settle this action. Ag. 42. Of that sum, $34,277.28 will go to plaintiff Eddy Aquino, in full settlement of his Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL) claims,

id.,

and $18,222.72 will go to plaintiffs attorneys for their fees and costs. /d.; see also Joint Ltr. at 2. The Agreement includes a unilateral but limited release, by which plaintiff releases defendants from “any and all claims, known or unknown” for "alleged unpaid wages and other related compensation and/or arising out of Plaintiff's separation of employment” that exist or may have existed “based upon any conduct occurring from the beginning of the world to the date of the Plaintiff's execution of this Agreement.” Ag. 4 3. There is no confidentiality clause or other contractual restriction on any party’s ability to speak about the case or its settlement. The Court has reviewed the terms of the Agreement and finds that they are fair and reasonable as required by Cheeks,

796 F.3d at 199

. The proposed fee award is also reasonable. Plaintiff’s attorneys will receive $18,222.72 in fees and costs, of which $1,084.08 will reimburse

them for the filing fee and other out-of-pocket costs incurred by counsel in connection with this action (see Dkt. No. 53-3), leaving $17,138.64 for their attorneys’ fee award. That sum represents approximately 33.3% of the net settlement payment of $51,415.92 (the gross settlement payment less costs), which is within the range ordinarily approved in this district. See Martinez v. SJG Foods LLC,

2017 WL 4676828

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2017) (quoting Meza v. 317 Amsterdam Corp.,

2015 WL 9161791

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2015)) (‘When using a percentage of the fund approach, ‘courts regularly approve attorney’s fees of one-third of the settlement amount in FLSA cases.’”). I have also reviewed counsel’s time records, which show a lodestar of $24,414.00, and therefore do not call into question the reasonableness of the fee. Accordingly, the proposed settlement is APPROVED. It is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcing the Agreement if necessary. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Dated: New York, New York April 10, 2020 SO ORDERED. el EU BARBARA MOSES ts” United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown