District Court, S.D. New York, 2020

Nixon v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

Nixon v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided April 21, 2020
Nixon v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

ELECTRONICALLY F DOC #: □ DATE FILED:__4/21/2( UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Donald Nixon, Plaintiff, 20-cv-2253 (AJN) —y— ORDER Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On April 17, 2020, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Rule 3.F of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, on or before April 27, 2020, Plaintiff must notify the Court and his adversary in writing whether (1) he intends to file an amended pleading and when he will do so or (2) he will rely on the pleading being attacked. Plaintiff is on notice that declining to amend his pleadings to timely respond to a fully briefed argument in the Defendant’s April 17 motion to dismiss may well constitute a waiver of the Plaintiff’s right to use the amendment process to cure any defects that have been made apparent by the Defendant’s briefing. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Sec., LLC., 797 F.3d 160, 190 (2d Cir. 2015) deaving “unaltered the grounds on which denial of leave to amend has long been held proper, such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, and futility”).

If Plaintiff chooses to amend, Defendant may then (a) file an answer; (b) file a new motion to dismiss; or (c) submit a letter stating that it relies on the initially-filed motion to dismiss.

Nothing in this Order alters the time to amend, answer or move provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules.

The initial pretrial conference scheduled for August 7, 2020 is adjourned pending resolution of this motion.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2020 New York, New York Ade Quali ALISONJ.NATHAN United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.