Rollins v. Adult Protective Services

District Court, S.D. New York

Rollins v. Adult Protective Services

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAROLYNROLLINS, SS

Plaintiff, 15-cv-6662 (PKC) -against- ORDER

ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al. Defendants. ween eee enna □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ CASTEL, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Carolyn Rollins, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Compel on January 22, 2020, which appears to assert that the case was improperly closed. (Docket # 81.) Judgment was entered in this case on January 5, 2017. (Docket # 70.) The Second Circuit dismissed Ms, Rollins’s appeal (Docket # 72) and this Court denied two subsequent motions for reconsideration. (Docket #75, 78.) The Court construes the January 22, 2020 motion as a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons previously explained by the Court, the motion is denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 81.) Copies mailed by Chambers. The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962),

Fn , fh SO ORDERED. yO OT LG GY Og La a oy eo P. Kevin Castel United States District Judge Dated: New York, New York April 22, 2020 MAILED BY CHAMBERS TO: Carolyn Rollins 40-03 29th Street LIC, New York, 11101

-2.

Reference

Status
Unknown