Laurel v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Laurel v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------- -- -- -- - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ORDER v. : : 15 CR 402 (VB) JUSTIN LAUREL, : 20 CV 3369 (VB) Defendant. : ------------------------- -- -- -- - - - - - -X On April 29, 2020, defendant Justin Laurel filed a motion for “compassionate release” pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A)@). That statute contains an explicit exhaustion requirement: “[T]he court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant’s behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant’s facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of imprisonment .. . if it finds that . . . extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction.” Defendant concedes he did not fully exhaust his administrative remedies under Section 3582 prior to filing the instant motion. The Court does not have the power to waive that requirement. See, e.g., United States v. Roberts,

2020 WL 1700032

(S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2020). By May 8, 2020, the government shall advise the Court in writing whether it is willing to waive the exhaustion requirement in this case. If the government is not willing to waive, the Court will deny the instant motion without prejudice to re-filing after the exhaustion requirement has been satisfied. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to defendant at the following address: Justin Laurel Reg. No. 72115-054 LSCI Butner P.O. Box 999 Butner, NC 27509 Dated: May 1, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown