Martinez-Done v. Tay-Taylor
Martinez-Done v. Tay-Taylor
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK tralia □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Diomedes MARTINEZ-DONE, Petitioner, Case No. 1:14-cv-3071 (CM) Wis Yvette TAY-TAYLOR, in her official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement, et al. Respondents. sete aalainaniiitmaR a eeemeana
ORDER This former Judge Scheindlin immigration case was recently reassigned to this Court after the Court of Appeals remanded the matter back to the district court: “In response to our September 19, 2019 Orders to Show Cause, the parties have not opposed remand. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the appeals are REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Nielsen v. Preap,
139 S. Ct. 954(2019), and Jennings v. Rodriguez,
138 S. Ct. 830(2018).” Martinez-Done v. Tay-Taylor, 14-4517. The parties have 45 days to brief th of on the issues, if afy, that remain in dispute. April 30, 2020 be Colleen McMahon Chief Judge
of 30 | ZOE |
Reference
- Status
- Unknown