Ardaneh v. U.S. Government

District Court, S.D. New York

Ardaneh v. U.S. Government

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HAMID REZA ARDANEH, Plaintiff, 1:20-CV-3450 (CM) -against- TRANSFER ORDER U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Hamid Reza Ardaneh, who is presently held in the Bridgewater State Hospital, in Bridgewater, Massachusetts, brings this pro se civil action in an attempt to remove to this Court what appear to be criminal or civil actions pending against him in state courts in Massachusetts. For the following reasons, the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. A defendant in a pending state criminal action who wishes to remove that action to a federal district court must “file in the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such prosecution is pending a notice of removal.”

28 U.S.C. § 1455

(a). A similar rule applies to a defendant in a pending state civil action who wishes to remove that action to a federal district court. See

28 U.S.C. § 1446

(a). Plaintiff’s criminal or civil actions are pending in state courts in Massachusetts. This Court is therefore the wrong venue for this action. Massachusetts constitutes one federal judicial district, the District of Massachusetts.

28 U.S.C. § 101

. The Court therefore transfers this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

28 U.S.C. § 1406

(a). CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: May 8, 2020 , New York, New York hie. I Wyk Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown