Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited v. SIMO Holdings Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited v. SIMO Holdings Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

HONG KONG UCLOUDLINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED and UCLOUDLINK (AMERICA), LTD., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-03399-JSR v. SIMO HOLDINGS INC., Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING ORAL MOTION FOR ALTERNATE SERVICE During a telephonic conference held on May 21, 2020, Plaintiffs Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Ltd. and Ucloudlink (America), Ltd. (collectively, “uCloudlink”) orally moved for an order allowing alternate service of the complaint on defendant SIMO Holdings Inc. (“SIMO”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). See Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.,

293 F.R.D. 508

(S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2013). Specifically, uCloudlink sought leave to serve the complaint electronically on SIMO’s counsel of record in a co-pending case before this Court involving the same parties and patent, SIMO Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Ltd. and Ucloudlink (America), Ltd., Case No. 18-CV-05427-JSR. Having considered the motion, the Court is of the opinion that service on SIMO’s domestic counsel is appropriate under Rule 4(f)(3). Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby GRANTED.

Dated:_ May 21 __, 2020 Sef | Le ‘United States District Juda —o-_-_

Reference

Status
Unknown