District Court, S.D. New York, 2020

Parrish v. 26 Motors Corp.

Parrish v. 26 Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided May 26, 2020
Parrish v. 26 Motors Corp.

Trial Court Opinion

‘USDC SDNY DOCUMENT □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: oe nnn nnn nn nnn nnn XK DATE FILED: 5/26/2020 ft CHEYENNE PARRISH, Plaintiff, 20-CV-01510 (LTS)(SN) -against- ORDER MOTORS CORP., et al., Defendants. nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn en eee eee X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On February 20, 2020, plaintiff Cheyenne Parrish, filed a complaint against defendants Motors Corp. and Yosef Ayzencot pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§201 et. seg. (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service was required within 90 days of the issuance of summons, or by May 21, 2020. Nothing on the docket reflects that service was made within this time.

The plaintiff shall submit a letter explaining whether she has served the defendants and, if not, the basis for failing to do so within the time period required. If the plaintiff has failed to serve the defendants within the time required and cannot establish good cause for such failure, the Court may dismiss the case without prejudice. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56. 62 (2d Cir. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

SO ORDERED. wn SARAH NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: New York, New York May 26, 2020

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.