Baker v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. New York

Baker v. Berryhill

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DIANE L. BAKER, DOC # _______ DATE FILED: 5/28/2020 Plaintiff, -against- 17 Civ. 8433 (AT) (DCF) ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER SECURITY, Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 50, of the Honorable Debra C. Freeman, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052,

2014 WL 1092967

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant is ORDERED to pay $8,156.33 in fees and expenses directly to Plaintiff, and is otherwise DENIED. R&R at 12. Plaintiffs motion for oral argument is DENIED.

Id.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 31 and 42, and close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2020 New York, New York □□□ ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown