Baker v. Berryhill
Baker v. Berryhill
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DIANE L. BAKER, DOC # _______ DATE FILED: 5/28/2020 Plaintiff, -against- 17 Civ. 8433 (AT) (DCF) ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER SECURITY, Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 50, of the Honorable Debra C. Freeman, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052,
2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant is ORDERED to pay $8,156.33 in fees and expenses directly to Plaintiff, and is otherwise DENIED. R&R at 12. Plaintiffs motion for oral argument is DENIED.
Id.The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 31 and 42, and close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2020 New York, New York □□□ ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown