Rosa v. United States of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Rosa v. United States of America

Trial Court Opinion

SS ah OR EEO We” United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 June 9, 2020 Action stayed for 30 days. USAO and Stephen Cha-Kim granted By ECF leave to withdraw as counsel to the named Deputy United States The Honorable P. Kevin Castel Marshals. United States District Court se SOD Southern District of New York ated: 6/10/2020 LO Rows Lp oF. / 500 Pearl Street P. Kevin Castel New York, NY 10007 United States District Judge Re: Rosa et al. v. United States et al., 19 Civ. 2473 (PKC) Dear Judge Castel: This Office represents the Defendants in this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), against several Deputy United States Marshals (“DUSMs?”). Fact discovery in this matter is scheduled to conclude on August 28, 2020. I write respectfully to inform the Court that pursuant to

28 C.F.R. § 50.15

(a), the Department of Justice has determined that the defendant DUSMs should retain separate counsel, to be provided at the Government’s expense. Accordingly, in order for separate counsel to be retained forthwith, Defendants respectfully request that the action be stayed for 30 days, or earlier if each of the individual defendants have obtained counsel prior to that date, with respect to the defendant DUSMs. Document discovery would continue with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against the United States, to ensure that once separate counsel has appeared, all parties will be in a position to swiftly complete depositions and expert discovery. Finally, Defendants respectfully request that the Court enter an order allowing the undersigned and this Office to withdraw as counsel for the defendant DUSMs pursuant to Local Rule 1.4. Given that “discovery is not complete and the case is not presently scheduled for trial,” granting this motion and allowing the defendant DUSMs to retain separate counsel “will not likely cause undue delay.” Whiting v. Lacara,

187 F.3d 317, 321

(2d Cir. 1999) (citation omitted). Should the Court so require, the Government is prepared to submit an ex parte affidavit in support of the motion to withdraw. Counsel for Plaintiffs consents to the request for a stay pending the individual DUSMs’ retention of counsel. Thank you for your consideration of these requests.

Respectfully,

GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney

By: /s/ Stephen Cha-Kim STEPHEN CHA-KIM Assistant United States Attorney (212) 637-2768 [email protected]

Reference

Status
Unknown