UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH KRUPPENBACHER, Plaintiff, 20-CV-0107 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated March 23, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause within sixty days why the Court should not dismiss his claims, brought under

, as time- barred. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not submitted a declaration in response to the Court’s March 23, 2020 order.1 Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to

(a)(1), is dismissed as time-barred under

(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal.

1 In a docket entry dated April 9, 2020, the Clerk’s Office noted, “OSC received Returned mail on 3/26/2020. Inmate refused mail.” It is unlikely, however, that the returned mail was the Court’s March 23, 2020 order to show cause, which was mailed to Plaintiff on March 26, 2020. (Dkt. Entry of March 26, 2020.) It appears more likely that the returned mail was the Court’s March 5, 2020 order granting Plaintiff’s IFP application. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Clerk’s Office has been unable to provide additional information regarding the returned mail. Whether Plaintiff refused the Court’s order or received it and failed to respond is immaterial to the Court’s decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims as untimely. Cf Coppedge v. United States,

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2020 , New York, New York hie l COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge