Franco v. New York City Department of Education
Franco v. New York City Department of Education
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MIRIAM FRANCO AND RAMON CARMONA, individually and as parents and natural guardians of K.C., Plaintiffs, 19 Civ. 2925 (KPF) ve ORDER NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ letter dated July 2, 2020, arguing that the Second Circuit’s decision in Ventura de Paulino v. New York City Department of Education, --- F.3d ---,
2020 WL 2516650(2d Cir. May 18, 2020) does not mandate dismissal of this action. (Dkt. #53). Defendant is hereby ORDERED to respond to Plaintiffs’ July 2, 2020 letter on or before July 15, 2020, in a letter brief not to exceed ten pages in length. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 6, 2020 Kittens fal ilo New York, New York KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown