Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit

District Court, S.D. New York

Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JEFFERY HAMM, Plaintiff, 1:20-CV-2687 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NY CITY PD PARKING ENFORCEMENT ACTION UNIT, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated April 28, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit an amended in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application or pay the $400.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order also required Plaintiff to update his address of record within thirty days. The Court specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice to Plaintiff’s refiling this action. Plaintiff has not filed an amended IFP application or paid the fees, and he has not updated his address of record. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice to Plaintiff’s refiling this action. See

28 U.S.C. §§ 1914

, 1915; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown