USEC sian EDOCUMEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT yl FECT RONECALLY biricts : SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OC oo | ROBERT W. JOHNSON, AY bas, “7 (>\aore | Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 7337 (GHW) JUDGMENT CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE; JANE DOE (CASE MANAGER FOR 2%? CIRCUIT APPEALS DOCKET “19-2174”); SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS; SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAIL DEPARMENT; JUDGE COLLEEN McMAHON; JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON; BENJAMIN H. TORRANCE, ESQ.; BARBARA D. UNDERWOOD, ESQ.; U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; U.S. POSTAL (OFFICE) SERVICE; PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. panne ene eee nee eee een □□□ It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 12, 2020, the Court bars Plaintiff from filing future civil actions IFP in this Court without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See

. Plaintiff must attach a copy of his proposed complaint and a copy of the order to any motion seeking leave to file. The motion must be filed with the Pro Se Intake Unit of this Court. If Plaintiff violates the order and files an action without filing a motion for leave to file, the Court will dismiss the action for failure to comply with the order. Plaintiff is further warned that the continued submission of frivolous documents may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See

The Court certifies under

(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an

appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York July 13, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: = —AMNGange