Virgo v. Garcia
Virgo v. Garcia
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGILLIO VIRGO, Plaintiff, 20-CV-5091 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDWARD GARCIA, UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated September 21, 2018, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in this Court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Virgo v. Wright, ECF 1:17-CV-10006, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 21, 2018). Plaintiff files this new pro se civil action but has not sought leave from the Court; he also did not file an IFP application. Because Plaintiff did not pay the relevant fees to bring this action, the Court assumes that he seeks IFP status and dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the September 21, 2018 order in Virgo, 1:17-CV-10006. The Clerk of Court is directed mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 17, 2020 , New York, New York huh. hich Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown