Doe v. City Of New York
Doe v. City Of New York
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_8/3/2020 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, 1:19-ev-06322-MKV -against- ORDER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., DISMISSAL. Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: It having been reported to this Court by the Parties that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the Post-Discovery Conference scheduled for August 5, 2020 is adjourned sine die. IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by September 5, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,
356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: August 3, 2020 MaRy(faY vvfsocd New York, NY United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown