District Court, S.D. New York, 2020

Subramanian v. Lupin Inc.

Subramanian v. Lupin Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided August 10, 2020
Subramanian v. Lupin Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

GreenbergTraurig DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCH Cis DATE FILED: 08/10/2020 Fax 973.295.1279 [email protected] July 10, 2020 VIA ECF Hon. Katharine H. Parker, U.S.M_J.

United States District Court Southern District of New York Pearl Street, Room 750 sO ORDERED: New York, New York 10007 . . v fh Qh + ah Re: | Veerapan Subramanian vy. Lupin, Inc., _ . HON. KATHARINE H. PARKER Civil Action No. 17-cv-5040 (RA)(KHP) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDG 08/10/2020 Dear Judge Parker: This firm represents Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendants (“Sellers”) in the above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Your Honor’s individual practice rule III.d to request that the Court accept for filing under seal Sellers’ unredacted_letter_ motion to compel and certain exhibits annexed thereto. These documents contain confidential information as previously designated by the Parties in this action.

Under the common law and First Amendment standard, documents submitted on a motion for summary judgment are afforded “a strong presumption of access.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F. Supp. 3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006). However, “[c]ourts commonly find that documents that contain ‘trade secrets, confidential research and development information, marketing plans, revenue information, pricing information, and the like’ satisfy the [Lugosch] sealing standard given the important privacy interests at stake.” Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc., 18-cv-00549 (BKS/CFH), 2019 WL 2918026, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 18, 2019) (internal citations omitted). In addition, proprietary business or financial information is appropriately filed under seal. Godson v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., 285 F.R.D. 255, 262 (W.D.N.Y. 2012); DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc. v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 435, 437, 440 (2016) (valuation report was appropriately sealed to avoid disclosure to competitors).

Under the Lugosch standard, “the privacy interests of third parties [also] carry great weight in the balancing of interests.” Dorsett v. Cty. of Nassau, 762 F. Supp. 2d 500, 521 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 800 F. Supp. 2d 453 (E.D.N.Y. 2011), aff'd sub nom. Newsday LLC v. Cty. of Nassau, 730 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2013); see also Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (“A party may overcome the presumption of access by demonstrating that sealing will further other substantial interests such as a third party's personal privacy interests”); Jn re Newsday, Inc., 895 Traurig, LLP | Attorneys at Law Campus Drive | Suite 400 | Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 | T+1 973.360.7900 | F +1 973.295.1279 F.2d 74, 79-80 (2d Cir. 1990) ("the privacy interests of innocent third parties as well as those of defendants that may be harmed by disclosure of the [ ] material should weigh heavily in a court's balancing equation").

Here, the redacted portion of the letter motion to compel and Exhibits G and H thereto should be filed under seal under the Lugosch standard because they contain details of a confidential settlement agreement in a prior lawsuit between Lupin and a third party. Lupin has asserted throughout this litigation that this information commercially sensitive and should not be available to Lupin’s competitors.

Similarly, Sellers seek to file Exhibit F to the motion, which contains an excerpt of the PSA under seal. Lupin has previously sought and obtained the Court’s leave to file the PSA under seal (see ECF Doc. No. 308).

Finally, Exhibits A, B, E, and I to the letter motion should be filed under seal because each contain voluminous excerpts and discussions of the content of depositions of Amy Brody and Sean Moriarty. These deposition excerpts concern Lupin’s settlement of a prior lawsuit with a third party and Lupin’s assertions of privilege concerning Lupin’s communications with experts. Lupin has designated these depositions confidential in their entirety, and out of an abundance of caution, Sellers request that such information be accepted for filing under seal.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Martin C. Fojas Martin C. Fojas Encl. cc:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.