Jackson v. Doe

District Court, S.D. New York

Jackson v. Doe

Trial Court Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: is UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 8/19/20 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK —_—<—SSSa ee ee ee ee eee ee eee eee eee ee eee eee x KENNIN D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, 1:18-cv-09274 -against- : ORDER JANE DOE et al, : Defendants. : eee ee ee ee eee eee ee ee ee eee eee x ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: On July 6, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by July 24, 2020 as to why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute the case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). ECF No. 31. Such showing was not made. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc.,

239 F.3d 206, 209

(2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. ..”). SO ORDERED. Co px Dated: August 19, 2020 fo at) New York, New York

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown