Williams v. FRM Socks, LLC
Williams v. FRM Socks, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED PAMELA WILLIAMS, individually and on DOC #: behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED:_ 8/24/2020 Plaintiff, 1:20-cv-03792 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL FRM SOCKS, LLC, Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Complaint in this action was filed on May 15, 2020 [ECF #1]. An executed summons was filed on the docket on June 12, 2020 [ECF #5]. Following an extension sought by Plaintiff, Defendants’ response to the complaint was due July 15, 2020 [ECF #7]. No responses were filed, and Plaintiff has not prosecuted this case to date. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued for failure to prosecute without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by September 24, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc.,
239 F.3d 206, 209(2d Cir. 2001) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 630(1962)).
SO ORDERED. | i . | Date: August 24, 2020 MARY Kay te New York, NY United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown