Service v. All Bright Dental of NY, P.C.

District Court, S.D. New York

Service v. All Bright Dental of NY, P.C.

Trial Court Opinion

BLEW LT AWIINIALL □□ □□□ DOC#: □□ DATE FILED; _8/26/2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee ee eee ee ee ee ee eee eee eee eee eee HX SHANTE SERVICE, Plaintiff,» 20-CV-1825 (ALC) -against- . ORDER ALL BRIGHT DENTAL OF NY, P.C., ET AL., Defendants. * ee ee ee eee ee ee ee ee eee eee eee eee eee HX ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: The Settlement Agreement presented to the Court is fair and reasonable, and adequate to redress Plaintiff’s claims in this action. For the reasons set forth in the Parties’ letter motion to approve the Settlement Agreement, ECF No. 20, and in accordance with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House Inc.,

796 F.3d 199

(2d Cir. 2015), the Court approves the Settlement Agreement.

SO ORDERED. Dated: August 26, 2020 Z (Ces New York, New York OS bm, HON. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown