Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK tr rr rrr rr rr ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee ee HH HK xX JUAN ISIDRO PERALTA VARGAS, Plaintiff(s), -against- 20-cv-7163 (LAK) BANC OF AMERICA LEASING & CAPITAL LLC, et ano.

Defendant(s) ttt rt rr tt ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee HX

ORDER

A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1332

and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: / The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass nv. Edwards,

194 U.S. 377

(1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,

87 F.3d 44

(2d Cir. 1996). a? The citizenship of one or more corporations. See

28 U.S.C. § 1332

(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,

494 U.S. 195

(1990). WY The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P.,

213 F.3d 48, 52

(2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before September 18, 2020, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2020 Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown