Isensee v. Resolute Energy Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Isensee v. Resolute Energy Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED JOHN ISENSEE, Individually and on Behalf of All DOC Others Similarly Situated, DATE FILED: _ 10/16/2020 □ Plaintiff, -against- 19 Civ. 551 (AT) RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION, ORDER RICHARD F. BETZ, NICHOLAS J. SUTTON, JAMES E. DUFFY, TOD C. BENTON, JOSEPH CITARRELLA, WILKIE S. COLYER, THOMAS O. HICKS, JR., GARY L. HULTQUIST, JANET W. PASQUE, ROBERT J. RAYMOND, and WILLIAM K. WHITE, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: On April 2, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to extend the time to file his motion for attorney’s fees until 14 days after the disposition of Jn re: Resolute Energy Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 19 Civ. 77 (D. De.). ECF No. 16. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a status letter every 45 days, with the first letter to be filed on May 18, 2020. Jd. Plaintiff did not file a status letter on May 18, 2020, nor the three status letters required since that date. Plaintiff is reminded that under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an action may be dismissed “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the federal rules] or a court order.” F.R.C.P. 41(b). “Rule 41(b) gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiffs case swa sponte for failure to prosecute.” Davis v. Town of Hempstead,

597 F. App’x 31, 32

(2d Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 16, 2020 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown