Onatolu v. S.S.I.

District Court, S.D. New York

Onatolu v. S.S.I.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADEKUNLE A. ONATOLU, Plaintiff, 20-CV-7604 (CM) -against- ORDER SSI, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: The Court denies Plaintiff leave to file this action because he has failed to comply with the Court’s order barring him from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining leave from this Court to file. See Onatolu v. U.S. Army, ECF 1:15-CV-2829, 4 (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2015).! The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). Plaintiff consents to electronic service. (ECF No. 3.) SO ORDERED. Dated: October 19, 2020 , New York, New York bie. Hk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

' Plaintiff attaches to his complaint a notice of appeal, a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal, and an application to appeal IFP. At the time Plaintiff filed his complaint, however, there was no order in this action from which to appeal, and the Court therefore does not address these documents.

Reference

Status
Unknown