Brown v. East 92nd Street Associates, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Brown v. East 92nd Street Associates, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROSEMARIE MacMILLAN BROWN, Plaintiff, 1:20-CV-6886 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL EAST 92 STREET ASSOCIATES, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 27, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $400.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not filed an amended IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. See

28 U.S.C. §§ 1914

, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2020 , New York, New York hie ly Wik COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown