Xochimitl v. Miller
Xochimitl v. Miller
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OMAR XOCHIMITL, Petitioner, 1:20-CV-9286 (CM) -against- TRANSFER ORDER CHRISTOPHER MILLER, Respondent. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner, currently incarcerated in the Great Meadow Correctional Facility, brings this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254challenging the constitutionality of his conviction and sentence issued by the New York Supreme Court, Kings County. Because Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Kings County, which is located in the Eastern District of New York, this action is transferred under Local Civil Rule 83.3 to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Petitioner should be permitted to proceed further without payment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. This order closes this action Because Petitioner has not at this time made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue under
28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2020 , New York, New York huh. hich COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown