Graciano v. Music123, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Graciano v. Music123, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Deut SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself DATE FILED: and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff ant, 20-CV-7620 (RA) v. ORDER MUSIC123, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: According to the parties’ joint letter, the parties have reached a settlement on all issues. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson vy. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: | November 25, 2020 p / New York, New York hy RONNIE ABRAMS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown