District Court, S.D. New York, 2020

Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security

Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided November 30, 2020
Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

uspcspsy—(‘i‘isés@rY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: nnnnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn X DATE FILED: 113072020.

ANTHONY WOODEN, Plaintiff, 19-CV-06710 (SN) -against- ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. nnn enn eX SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On November 9, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the petitions for writ of certiorari in Carr v. Saul, 961 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2020), and Davis v. Saul, 963 F.3d 790 (8th Cir. 2020), which presented the question: Whether claimants seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act must exhaust Appointments Clause challenges before the Administrative Law Judge as a prerequisite to obtaining judicial review.

See cert. granted Carr v. Saul, 592 U.S. _, No. 19-1442, 2020 WL 6551771, (Nov. 9, 2020) (consolidating both cases).

Accordingly, the Court directs the parties to meet and confer, and to file a joint letter with the Court no later than December 14, 2020, describing whether the parties agree to a stay in this case pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision on the issue.

SO ORDERED. abe: NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: New York, New York November 30, 2020

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.