Snell v. Harris

District Court, W.D. New York

Snell v. Harris

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT > □ □ WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \ XS □ |

CHRISTOPHER A. SNELL, Petitioner, Vv. 16-CV-122 DECISION & ORDER BILL HARRIS, Warden, and ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, New York Attorney General, Respondents.

On February 1, 2016, the petitioner, Christopher A. Snell, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. Docket Item 1. On June 22, 2016, the respondents responded, Docket Item 8, and on July 21, 2016, Snell replied, Docket Item 10. On October 17, 2019, this Court referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer for all proceedings under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) or (A) and (B). Docket Item 13. On January 14, 2020, Judge Roemer issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) finding that Snell's application for a writ of habeas corpus should be denied and his petition should be dismissed. Docket Item 19. The parties did not object to the R&R, and the time to do so now has expired. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A district court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge's

recommendation to which a party objects.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). But neither

28 U.S.C. § 636

nor Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 requires a district court to review the recommendation of a magistrate judge to which no objections are raised. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985). Although not required to do so in light of the above, this Court nevertheless has reviewed Judge Roemer's R&R as well as the parties’ submissions to him. Based on that review and the absence of any objections, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Roemer's recommendation to deny Snell’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismiss Snell's petition. For the reasons stated above and in the R&R, Snell’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and his petition, Docket Item 1, is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file.

SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4. 2020 Buffalo, New York

LA RN } VILARDO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown