National Life Insurance Company of Vermont v. Dong
National Life Insurance Company of Vermont v. Dong
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER Plaintiff, 19-CV-4597 (NGG) (CLP) -against- WEI DONG and RU CHEN, Defendants. NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Plaintiff National Life Insurance Company (“National”) brought this action against Defendants Wei Dong and Ru Chen, seeking a declaratory judgment that a life insurance policy (“the Policy”) issued by Plaintiff on Dong’s life is void – either ab initio or as against public policy – because Defendants procured the policy fraudulently as part of a scheme to fake Dong’s death and collect his life insurance benefits. (Compl. (Dkt. 1) ¶ 4.) After Defendants failed to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, the Clerk of Cout entered a certificate of default and Plaintiff moved for default judgment. (See Clerk’s Entry of Default (Dkt. 10); Mot. for Default J. (Dkt. 19).) The court referred Plaintiff’s motion to Magistrate Judge James Orenstein for a Report & Recommendation. (See April 14, 2020 Order Referring Mot.) Following Judge Orenstein’s retirement, the case was reassigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. (See Nov. 12, 2020 Notice of Case Reassignment.) On March 8, 2021, Judge Pollak issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommended that the court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, declare the Policy void ab initio on the basis of Defendants’ fraudu- lent scheme, and permit Plaintiff to rescind the Policy and retain the premiums paid in order to offset the fees, costs, and expenses it incurred in investigating Defendants’ scheme. (R&R (Dkt. 24) at 16.) No party has objected to Judge Pollak’s R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM) (JO),
2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v.
1 Walker, 216F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the (Dkt. 24) R&R in full and GRANTS Plaintiffs (Dkt. 19) Mo- tion for Default Judgment. The court declares the Policy void ab initio. Plaintiff may rescind the Policy and retain the $20,791.04 balance on the premiums. SO ORDERED.
Dated: — Brooklyn, New York April 16, 2021 /s/ Nicholas G. Garaufis NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown