Jacobson v. Law Offices of Michael Michael PLLC
Jacobson v. Law Offices of Michael Michael PLLC
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------x DANIEL JACOBSON, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-02728-FB-RML -against-
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL MICHAEL PLLC, MICHAEL MICHAEL,
Defendants. ------------------------------------------------x Appearances: For the Defendants: For the Plaintiff: MARK K. ANESH BRUCE J. CHERIFF SARAH A. ADAM Cheriff & Fink, P.C. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP PO Box 985 77 Water Street, Suite 2100 Mt. Kisco, NY 10549-0985 New York, NY 10005
BLOCK, Senior District Judge: On May 18, 2021, Magistrate Judge Roanne Mann issued a sua sponte Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the pending action “be remanded” to “Supreme Court, Kings County.” See ECF No. 7 at 2. Magistrate Judge Mann noted that the forum defendant rule is controlling in this case because the defendants are citizens of New York. Id. at 1. The rule bars a defendant who is a resident of the state in which removal is sought from removing an action to federal court. See, e.g., Gibbons v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.,
919 F.3d 699, 705(2d Cir. 2019); see also
28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2). A district court may order remand sua sponte within 30 days of filing of the notice of removal. Here, the notice of removal was filed on May 14, 2021, and Magistrate Judge Mann’s sua sponte R&R was filed on
May 18, 2021. The R&R stated that failure to object within fourteen days of the date of the R&R precludes further review. No objections were filed. If clear notice has been
given of the consequences of failing to object and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See, e.g., Smith v. Campbell,
782 F.3d 93, 102(2d Cir. 2015). The Court will excuse the failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error.
See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F .3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears in Magistrate Judge Mann’s decision. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R and orders the action REMANDED to
Supreme Court, Kings County. SO ORDERED. _/S/ Frederic Block_________ FREDERIC BLOCK Senior United States District Judge
Brooklyn, New York June 25, 2021
Reference
- Status
- Unknown